Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Review: Unwrap My Heart by Alex Falcone and Ezra Fox

When I first scammed a free review copy of Unwrap My Heart, I wasn't sure what I was getting myself into. Sure, co-authors Alex Falcone and Ezra Fox have shown, across hundreds of episodes of the Read It and Weep podcast, that they are great at dissecting bad books. But, as I discovered about halfway through performing my own knee surgery to save money, putting things together is a lot harder than taking things apart.

Unwrap My Heart is a YA supernatural parody romance, first conceived on the Read It and Weep podcast. The book is narrated from the perspective of high schooler Sophia, who finds herself falling in love with the new guy Seth—who's pretty obviously a secret mummy. The sunken, hollow eyes and bandages are a bit of a giveaway, though most people pass it off as a hipster affectation. Sophia, for her part, is accident prone to the point of constant self-endangerment, so vacuous that you wonder what Seth could possibly see in her, and entirely unperturbed as Seth graduates from creepy stalker behavior, to infantilizing her, to outright manipulation by selective refusal to communicate.

If any of this sounds oddly familiar, it's because Unwrap My Heart rarely strays from its chief well of parody: the Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer. Even when it does depart, it does so with a nod (or perhaps a middle finger) to the popular series about a hundred-year-old vampire dating a teenage girl. Take the moment when Seth clears up some confusion regarding his own age:

"We're basically the same age. Which is good, really. Monster or no, if I was hundreds or thousands of years older than you this would be a really troubling relationship."

But is Unwrap My Heart any good? And have I been stalling on answering that question, in the hopes of screwing with the authors' heads, playing upon their emotional and artistic investment for no better reason than my own sadistic pleasure? The answer to both questions is a resounding "yes," and if you've forgotten what the first question even was, let me reiterate: I loved every page of this wonderful little book.

The voice of Unwrap My Heart is reminiscent of the playful, sarcastic tone of a Read It and Weep episode, and I was pleased to discover that the authors' skill at podcasting is matched by a skill for novel-writing. The book has a coherent, satisfying, and well-paced plot. The prose is smooth. The jokes come frequently enough to keep you chuckling, but not so thick as to take you out of the story, or to turn it into a hollow farce. Against all odds, a couple of podcasters decided to base their first novel on an off-hand joke from the show, and somehow managed to create a real page turner.

The one area where the book falls short is in the characters. While they are undeniably interesting, for the most part they aren't terribly engaging. Considering the book's core purpose—to satirize the genre and make a mockery of fantasy writers tapping ever-more-outlandish creatures for teenage girls to have a problematic romance with—it's hard to fault the authors for this. But I will fault them, both because they chose their premise and now must live with it, and because it turns out I'm kind of a jerk.

The great shortcoming in the characters is that, for the most part, they're simply not characters. Instead, they're jokey reflections of characters from other books. Sophia's dad is warm-hearted, devoted, and rocks an amazing mustache because the dad in Twilight has these traits. Motivations and hobbies seem to exist solely to service a joke or reference. I could easily forgive this if the book was a farce through and through, but there's a welcome thread of sincerity weaved into its pages which makes you want to care about these characters, while the characters themselves give you little to care about.

But this is not a fatal flaw. Despite the weak characters, Unwrap My Heart is an absolute delight to read. It's a balm for these trying times and an antidote to the abusive romances found in so much bestselling YA fiction. I found myself staying up late, walking to the store with my nose buried in my Kindle, and reading in a parked car for so long that my neighbors worried I was having a stroke, because I just couldn't put it down.

In short, I highly recommend this book and I can't wait to see what these folks cook up next.

Unwrap My Heart will be available December 1st, 2016 on Amazon and through the book's website at http://unwrapmyheart.com/

Note also that familiarity with the Twilight series and other books in that genre is not required to enjoy Unwrap My Heart, but if you really want to brush up on it, the Read It and Weep crew have you covered with the extensive review that kicked off their podcast.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Something else you can do

If you're liberally inclined, and looking for another way to take action, feel free to use or adapt the following letter I'll be sending to any media outlets who try to normalize Stephen Bannon's antisemitic, homophobic, racist, misogynist, and bigoted beliefs. When you see a newspaper, news program, or news site calling him a "hardcore conservative," or a "nationalist," or otherwise disguising his attitudes for the sake of false balance, you can just fill in the blanks and send it off. Newspapers, in particular, really do seem to weigh these sorts of letters when deciding the tone of future reporting, if they receive enough of them.
 I believe in the importance of neutral reporting, which is why I'm so concerned about your recent characterization of Stephen Bannon as "[hardcore conservative/ other inaccurate category]." To call Bannon, the president-elect's current choice for White House Chief Strategist a [inaccurate category] is not neutrality. The principle of journalistic neutrality is served when the facts are reported objectively, without bias or partisan judgement. It is not served by euphemisms that hide a subject's disreputable beliefs from your readers, and it is certainly not served by soft-peddling bigotry.

Now, I'm not asking you to call Stephen Bannon a bigot. I'm asking that, instead of the sanitized, normalizing, and comforting characterization from your [date] article entitled [title], you provide quotations and context which will allow your readers to decide the matter for themselves. After all, if you are not providing enough information for your readers to make their own judgement, then what is your purpose as journalists?
And if you're conservatively inclined... well, maybe you should consider sending a letter like this, anyway. I mean, do you really want "conservative" to become a euphemism for Steve Bannon's sort of bigotry? That's as much a smear against you, as it is a normalization of hate against me.

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

My Vagenda for the Morning

This morning, first thing after I made coffee, I began contacting my state and local representatives, to make sure they know that my priority as a California voter is to stand against the direction America is likely to go in the new year. My newly elected state assemblyman, Marc Berman, doesn't have an office that can take telephone calls yet, so I resorted to e-mail, and had a chance to put down in writing the central points of the discussions I'd had with aides to my other representatives.

Here it is:
I'm a voter in Mountain View, and I believe that, just as California has to lead progress in the nation in the good times, it has to fight the rearguard action in the dark times. So, as the new California assembly meets, I would like Marc to sponsor and support bills to achieve the following:


1. Affirm the right of cities in California to designate themselves as sanctuaries for undocumented immigrants, and to do all that can be done at the state level to help those areas protect their residents from deportation. This doesn't only protect immigrants today, but sets the stage to protect others if things really go bad. Above all, I don't want to see my friends torn from their families. As a transgender woman, I also have to look to the remote but growing possibility that some day someone is going to come for me. Enshrining sanctuaries into California law would help quell both of those fears.


2. I would like the California Assembly to vote on a statement of principles affirming California's commitment to the rights and safety of all people, whether they're Muslim, Jewish, LGBTQ, people of color, disabled, or members of any other minority group. The nation should have someone to look to at a time like this, and as we believe in the essential dignity of all people, that responsibility falls on us.


3. I would also like the assembly to vote to reaffirm California's commitment to end global warming and reduce carbon emissions. We're such a large part of the nation's economy that we can go a long way toward helping, just on our own. We can set an example not just for the nation, but for the world, to show that you can fight global warming and not just maintain but strengthen your economy.



4. Finally, I'd like Marc to do what can be done to help keep healthcare coverage for as many people as possible. I know this is a tough one, considering the federal money we're going to lose for Medi-Cal. No one's expecting a miracle. But we have a duty to at least show willing, to patch wherever we can, and to help as many people as the budget allows.


Okay. That's all for now. Let's make a difference where we can.
 A lot of people are very worried about what's going to happen to them in 2017. I've been seeing a lot of people from vulnerable demographics, even in progressive areas, who are suddenly hopeless for their future, and more who feel helpless to protect their loved ones. If that's you, this is something you can do today. Call them. Write them. Show up in person.

Saturday, November 5, 2016

How It Should Will Have Ended: A Song of Ice and Fire

Garrett Calcaterra, author and blogger extraordinaire, invited me and some other authors to finish off the A Song of Ice and Fire series. You know, just in case George R. R. Martin is hit by a bus. Or dies peacefully in his sleep from a sudden and painless ailment. I don't know why it always has to be buses.

ANYWAY!

Head on over there and check it out!

http://garrettcalcaterra.blogspot.com/2016/11/how-would-you-finish-george-rr-martins.html

Sunday, October 9, 2016

Credit Where Credit is Due

You know, as much as I despise Donald Trump, I have to admit he's using this latest scandal for the benefit of the community.


Trump Grabs some Pussy

Saturday, October 1, 2016

Early Aircraft as Tools of War

Last month, we examined the earliest attempts at unpowered flight, and saw humanity as a fledgling bird, taking its first uncertain hops into the glorious skies above. Now we'll explore the next logical step: using the skies to kill people.

We already touched on this in the previous article, where we learned that the first documented use of the Kongming lantern was to frighten enemy troops, and that early kites were employed in military signaling and propaganda. But what about balloons big enough to lift a person?
 

My Balloon Against the World

In Europe, as in China, military applications soon followed the invention of flying machines. In 1796, just ten years after the first recorded flight of a manned balloon, the French Revolutionary Army found itself outmatched and outnumbered. France was at war with a coalition consisting of Prussia, Austria, Great Britain, Spain, Sardinia, Naples, the Dutch Republic, Ducklovia, Gondor, the Romulans, and I think probably Chuck Norris. The French National Convention's first response was… well, it was probably to shit their pants. But the second response was to institute the levée en masse, conscripting all able bodied men aged 18-25 into military service and ushering in a new era of total war in Europe.

Captain Coutelle at the battle of Fleurus
Captain Coutelle at the battle of Fleurus
But it wasn’t enough to simply have more men on the field, so the Revolutionary Army looked for new tactics and new ideas. Among these was the Compagnie D'Aerostiers, or Company of Balloonists. The advantage offered by aerial warfare, however, was not recognized by everyone. Upon arriving at the front with his balloon, Captain Jean Marie-Joseph Coutelle was stopped by a superior officer and nearly shot as a "suspicious character" for his wild notion of ascending above the battlefield in a balloon[1] .

Despite this skepticism, Coutelle made a good account of himself, observing Austrian troop movements through a telescope from his balloon, and relaying the information via signal flag to officers below. Not only did this allow the French to match their enemy's maneuvers, move for move, but it had a significant effect on morale, assuring the French that their foe could hold no surprises for them. The very presence of the French balloon likewise sowed worry among the Austrians, who only had to look up to see that they were under constant observation[2] .
 

Blow Them Up to Blow Them Up

The use of balloons as observation platforms was now established, but their use as an offensive weapon would not come for another half a century. Oddly enough, it was Austria—first to suffer the effects of aerial observation—who would pioneer aerial bombardment. Its target was Venice, which had been acquired by Austria as part of an exchange of territories at the end of the War of the First Coalition in 1797, just a year after Captain Coutelle first took to the skies above a battlefield. But by 1848, Venetians were sick and tired of Austrian mismanagement, and they rebelled.

Venice balloon attack, 1849
Venice balloon attack, 1849
Venice has historically been a tough nut to crack for besieging armies, due to the natural protection afforded by the Venetian Lagoon. The Austrians found it no different, and struggled to get a foothold in the rebellious city. So they bombed it. Of the 60,000 artillery rounds aimed at the city, most were fired from gunboats or batteries on shore[3] [4] , but a few explosive shells were dropped by balloon.

William Henry Stiles, an American diplomat stationed in Vienna at the time, describes an early test on June 24th, 1848. Stiles's secondhand account says that these first balloons were launched trailing a long length of copper wire, which attached to a galvanic battery on the ground. When the balloons were positioned over their target, an electrical signal dropped the bomb and lit its fuse, so that it exploded approximately when it hit the ground. Stiles's report is a little sketchy, seeing how far away from the action he was, but there's no doubt that these early tests were unsuccessful. He reports that all of the bombs fell into the water[5] , while other sources are notably silent about any balloon-borne terror from above on that date.

Franz von Uchatius, the actual inventor of the bomb-balloons in question, provides an account of a more refined attempt, made on July 15th. This time the balloons were launched by steamship, there was no battery, and the balloons seem to have been untethered. The explosive shells from the previous test seem to have been swapped out for shrapnel shells—gunpowder impregnated with lead bullets. They were detonated by timed fuses, which had to be set precisely to ensure they detonated once the wind currents had taken them over the city[6] . Uchatius called this attack a great success, writing gleefully of the "extreme terror and the morale effect produced on the inhabitants." Setting aside his air of mordenfreude, Uchatius' claim is dubious at best, because shrapnel shells cannot achieve their full lethal effect without the velocity gained from being shot from a cannon[7] , and because no one ever bothered to repeat the operation.
 

[Bad Pun] and Lowe

But, while balloons had failed their first use as offensive weapons, they retained their utility in observation, which brings us to the American Civil War and Thaddeus Lowe. Lowe had long been interested in lighter-than-air craft, and on April 19, 1861—five days after the start of hostilities at Fort Sumter—he took off from Cincinnati in an attempt to fly by balloon to New York. The weather gods were not on his side, however, and the wind carried him instead to South Carolina, where the first people he encountered assumed he'd been sent from the devil[8] . On a more personal note, I've been to South Carolina and they thought I was sent by the devil, too.

Lowe's portable hydrogen generators filling the observation balloon Intrepid.
Lowe's portable hydrogen generators filling the observation balloon Intrepid.
Lowe's exploits reached Lincoln, and he was called upon to form the Union Army Balloon Corps, to provide observations of enemy movement, report on the fall of cannon shot, and assist in mapmaking. Information could be instantly communicated to commanders below, by telegraph wire or signal flags. Lowe developed portable hydrogen generators carried by wagons, allowing balloons to be carried anywhere and inflated on site. He even employed the first aircraft carrier, when he launched a balloon from a converted coal barge[9] .

Aerial observation was valued by the men on the ground, and even by some of their commanding officers. At The Battle of Seven Pines, his aerial observations turned what could have been a disaster into a mere quagmire. Among other observations, he noted the advance of Confederate forces encircling General Samual Heintzelman's detached force, and so saved it from annihilation[10] . This was quite fitting, as Heintzelman was an admirer of the balloon's use in warfare. Earlier in the campaign, he'd even gone up himself, observing Confederate defenses at Yorktown from one of Lowe's balloons[11] .

Observation balloon launched from coal barge.
Observation balloon launched from coal barge.
Despite this, the army's administrative staff was no friend to the Balloon Corps. Lowe provided his services as a civilian contractor, which alone bred disrespect from army officers, as well as resentment over the high pay he received for his specialist services. After Seven Pines, he was laid low by a bout of malaria and he returned to service to find that his equipment had been taken by the office of the quartermaster[12] . The gutted Balloon Corps was juggled from the Topographic Engineers to the Army Quartermaster office to the Corps of Engineers[13] , where a final insult was inflicted by cutting Lowe's pay by 40%. He resigned shortly after[14] , and his Balloon Corps languished before finally being disbanded.

But the American Civil War had not finished making its mark on aeronautics. In August of 1863, months after he lost his job due to the termination of the Balloon Corps, German immigrant and balloon pilot John Steiner ran into a military observer visiting from Germany. The observer was staying at a hotel just across the street from where Steiner had his personal balloon tethered, and Steiner offered to take him up in it. Suspended above Minnesota, the two discussed the limitations of a balloon, and the possibility of overcoming them by making a steerable airship. Steiner suggested an aerodynamic design: a cigar-shaped envelope with a rudder at the back.

And who was this mystery passenger that Steiner discussed his radical idea with? A snot-nosed 25-year-old first lieutenant by the name of Ferdinand Adolf August Heinrich Graf von Zeppelin[15] .
 

For Want of a Mail

Paris Balloon Mail, 1870
Paris Balloon Mail, 1870
The next great adventure in military ballooning would come from Paris. In 1870, nearly a century after it saw the first manned balloon flights ever recorded, the city found itself encircled by Prussian forces, with no way to get a message out by land.

Enter, the post office.

You didn't think that's where this was going, did you? It may seem absurd, but in the midst of a war that threatened to tear France apart, amid famine and siege, it was the post office that stood determined to maintain contact with the outside world, so that it could continue to deliver the mail[16] . Scoff all you want, but let's see what you do when you may have already won ten million dollars, and the Prussian army is stopping you from returning the reply card.

Inside the besieged city, pilots were trained, silk was commandeered, and balloons were constructed by seamstresses in idle railway stations. In all, 66 balloons were launched and 64 landed safely, the other two being blown out to sea. Each balloon could carry hundreds of pounds of letters—military and civilian—and the occasional officer hoping to muster a relief force from the countryside. Homing pigeons carried microfilm letters back into Paris, which were then recopied and delivered, allowing the mail to run in both directions. Over the course of the siege, balloon-mail carried two and a half million letters, 400 pigeons, and 102 passengers[17] .

Balloon construction in a Paris railway station.
Balloon construction in a Paris railway station.
Paris ultimately succumbed to the siege, but the Prussians were duly impressed by the shocking efficiency of the first air mail service. In 1874, German postmaster Heinrich von Stephan reminisced about it in a speech to the Berlin Science Society, and argued for a global system of mail and personal transportation by air. Among those who were inspired by a transcript of his speech? A worldly, 35-year-old Count by the name of Ferdinand Adolf August Heinrich Graf von Zeppelin[18] .
 


By Fire, Wire, and Cricket

At the turn of the next century, the dirigible airship would join the balloon in the role of military observation, and in World War I the airplane became master of the skies. But even in World War I, the balloon had a vital role in aerial observation. A tethered balloon could communicate by telegraph wire with an efficiency matched only by airships carrying expensive, finicky wireless sets. This made the balloon the preferred platform for reporting on the fall of artillery shells, which by that time were routinely fired from beyond the visual range of their gunners[19] .
World War II saw continued balloon use, both as observation platforms and as weapons. Everyone already knows about Britain's barrage balloons, lofted in the hope that Luftwaffe aircraft would either be damaged by their steel tethers or avoid areas with barrage balloons altogether. And of course there's Japan's incendiary balloons, sent over the Pacific on high altitude wind currents to attack mainland America.

Lesser known, but perhaps of more military significance than either, was Britain's Operation Outward. Outward involved nearly a hundred thousand hydrogen balloons, each fitted with either an incendiary device or a ground-trailing steel wire intended to short out high voltage power lines. Launched from Britain, they were carried by the wind across the North Sea and into Germany. The plan was not popular among the RAF, who were nervous about collisions between Outward balloons and their own aircraft[20] , nor among the Board of Admiralty, where one official complained that, "attacks of this nature should not be originated from a cricketing country[21] ."

Due to the above-mentioned RAF worries, the balloons were only released during daylight hours, despite fears from Operation Outward planners that daylight balloon attacks could be intercepted more easily. They were right, but even this proved to be a blessing in disguise. The Luftwaffe sent up fighters to intercept the balloons, costing fuel they could ill-afford to waste, and causing wear on their aircraft. So, because the balloons were so cheap to manufacture, at only two pounds sterling each, they could benefit the war effort even if none of them got through German defenses.

Operation Outward Launch Party
Operation Outward Launch Party. Photo from the UK National Archives, used under OGL.
Notwithstanding the objections of Lord Pishposh-and-Cricket, Outward was a great success. The balloons shorted power grids, started forest fires, and in one case damaged a circuit breaker at the Böhlen power plant—setting off a chain reaction that ultimately destroyed the entire facility and knocked 250 megawatts of German electrical generating capacity out of commission[22] .

Another bonus came from within the Nazi party, where a high-level party member designed a special clamp for use on high voltage lines, that was meant to minimize damage from wire-trailing balloons by disconnecting the transmission lines. Unfortunately for German power grids, the new clamp also disconnected during ice storms or high winds. But because the inventor was politically well-connected, the new clamps stayed in service long after they were proven counter-productive[23] .

Even when it wasn't wrecking Germany's shit by direct and indirect means, the operation forced the German government to divert manpower to repair crews, which had to remain on standby for repairing damaged infrastructure, and so couldn't be used for war production. Operation Outward, by comparison, used very little manpower at all. In fact, what it mostly used was womanpower. Whaaaaaaat? You mean to say that a lady can launch a balloon? Lord Pishposh would be flabbergasted. But yes, 140 personnel from the Women's Royal Naval Service served as the bulk of the workforce, launching 1000 balloons per day[24] .

And so we see that Hitler fell for both of the two classic blunders. The first, of course, is to never get involved in a land war in Asia, but the second and only slightly less well-known is this: never go in against a chick with a balloon when death is on the line.


For further reading, check out the references listed below. And if your interest is piqued by ladies in the lighter-than-air business, I recommend David D. Levine's excellent Arabella of Mars, which takes an age-of-sail adventure that would do Patrick O'Brian proud, and places it in a classic sci-fi setting akin to Edgar Rice Burroughs's Barsoom series.


 [1]Payne, Lighter than Air, 15

 [2]Payne, Lighter than Air, 16

 [4]Stiles, Austria in 1848-49, Volume 1, 332-333

 [5]Stiles, Austria in 1848-49, Volume 1, 333-334

 [6]http://airminded.org/2009/08/22/the-first-air-bomb-venice-15-july-1849/

 [7]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrapnel_shell#Development_of_shrapnel_shell

 [8]Payne, Lighter Than Air, 16-17

 [9]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Army_Balloon_Corps

 [10]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Army_Balloon_Corps#Peninsula_Campaign

 [11]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Yorktown_(1862)#Aftermath

 [12]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Army_Balloon_Corps#Troubled_Balloon_Corps

 [13]Payne, Lighter Than Air, 18

 [14]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thaddeus_S._C._Lowe#End_of_the_Balloon_Corps

 [15]Hallion, Taking Flight, 94

 [16]Allaz, History of Air Cargo and Airmail, 16

 [17]Payne, Lighter Than Air, 19

 [18]De Syon, Zeppelin!, 15

 [19]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_military_ballooning#World_War_I

 [20]http://magazine.ieee-pes.org/september-october-2011/operation-outward/2/

 [21]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Outward#History_and_development

 [22]http://magazine.ieee-pes.org/september-october-2011/operation-outward/3/

 [23]http://magazine.ieee-pes.org/september-october-2011/operation-outward/3/

 [24]http://magazine.ieee-pes.org/september-october-2011/operation-outward/2/

Thursday, September 29, 2016

Review: Borderline by Mishell Baker



You know, I usually hate books about the film industry. In my personal hierarchy of literary sins, they rank right below books about tortured writers. I mention this so you'll understand where I'm coming from, when I say that Borderline is one of the best books I've read this year.

Mishell Baker starts with a backdrop that I've just had it up to here with, but presents it in a way that's fresh and interesting. Not just by giving us an L.A. that's swimming with fae-folk, and not just by tying them into filmmaking in a delightful way, but by letting us see this world from a rarely-seen point of view.

The protagonist, Millie, is a borderline, double amputee, suicide attempt survivor with severe facial scarring, a penchant for impulsive behavior, and a wry sense of humor. This is such a welcome relief from the typical L.A. protagonist, whose most pronounced character trait is usually a vague sense of ennui. But Millie has grit, and spunk, and if she ever ran into that typical L.A. protagonist, I'm pretty sure she'd kick his ass on general principle. I believe she could do it, too, with or without her prosthetics.

I may be wandering from the point, however. This is a fantastic book. The writing is beautiful, the dialogue is crisp, the plot is twisty and interesting, and the characters are believable. I love it, and I can't wait for the next book in the series.